wzyboyunread, Dec 4, 2009, 2:38:42 PM12/4/09 to GFans 如题。我这儿三个地址都一样的,还算比较快吧。 话说我写这封信的时候发现“Inserting images”功能不见了……去Labs看,正常的 ----- Sent from Wuxi, Jiangsu, China 国士无双unread, Dec 4, 2009, 2:42:30 PM12/4/09 to 夜の猫さまunread, Dec 4, 2009, 2:43:09 PM12/4/09 to wzyboyunread, Dec 4, 2009, 2:43:58 PM12/4/09 to fans 为什么twitter上有人反应Ping不通呢? ----- Sent from Wuxi, Jiangsu, China alex.vuunread, Dec 4, 2009, 2:44:24 PM12/4/09 to 8.8.8.8 115ms,8.8.4.4 120ms,4.3.2.1 120ms 均为平均值
文剑unread, Dec 4, 2009, 2:46:50 PM12/4/09 to rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 66.972/71.091/73.565/1.775 ms -- 文剑 wzyboyunread, Dec 4, 2009, 2:52:56 PM12/4/09 to 我发现你们大都比我快嘛…嗯,可能是和我在同一局域网里的一台电脑正在疯狂下载的关系
Mosesunread, Dec 4, 2009, 2:57:29 PM12/4/09 to 我ping不通, -- -- ---------------------------- Chan Qianunread, Dec 4, 2009, 5:34:33 PM12/4/09 to Microsoft Windows [版本 5.2.3790] (C) 版权所有 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp. C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 8.8.8.8 Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=242 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=242 Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 61ms, Maximum = 64ms, Average = 62ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 8.8.4.4 Pinging 8.8.4.4 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.4.4: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Reply from 8.8.4.4: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=242 Reply from 8.8.4.4: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 8.8.4.4: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=242 Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 62ms, Maximum = 70ms, Average = 64ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>ping 4.3.2.1 Pinging 4.3.2.1 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 4.3.2.1: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=242 Reply from 4.3.2.1: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 4.3.2.1: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=242 Reply from 4.3.2.1: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=242 Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 62ms, Maximum = 72ms, Average = 65ms C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator> wzyboyunread, Dec 4, 2009, 5:45:45 PM12/4/09 to alex.vuunread, Dec 4, 2009, 7:42:12 PM12/4/09 to 从版本号来看貌似就是windows server 2003了。 Joshuaunread, Dec 4, 2009, 7:46:54 PM12/4/09 to alex.vuunread, Dec 4, 2009, 7:49:53 PM12/4/09 to dns是无法实现翻墙的,不管你用什么dns都一样。 Davidunread, Dec 5, 2009, 5:59:49 AM12/5/09 to zhudogsupe.wangleiunread, Dec 5, 2009, 6:54:41 AM12/5/09 to Hua Panunread, Dec 6, 2009, 1:03:16 PM12/6/09 to 啊,噩耗啊,沈阳联通还能用,千万别给墙了 Best RegardsHua Pan 盈展unread, Dec 6, 2009, 4:34:23 PM12/6/09 to 家里使的是方正宽带,应该是网通系的,ping一下大概平均在82上下。我家里用起来很快,很不错,没有的站点直接转到google搜索去了,这点应该是google花钱让这个DNS之所以存在的最大理由。 spallunread, Dec 7, 2009, 6:37:17 AM12/7/09 to GFans Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] C:\Documents and Settings\zen>ping 8.8.8.8 Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8: Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 133ms, Average = 63ms C:\Documents and Settings\zen>ping 8.8.4.4 Pinging 8.8.4.4 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.4.4: bytes=32 time=109ms TTL=242 Ping statistics for 8.8.4.4:
Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 109ms, Average = 56ms C:\Documents and Settings\zen> > 话说我写这封信的时候发现"Inserting images"功能不见了......去Labs看,正常的 > > Google DNS.png Fromeast Tseunread, Dec 8, 2009, 11:42:15 AM12/8/09 to fans 我这里完全ping不通啊~ -- 阿锋™unread, Dec 8, 2009, 12:00:17 PM12/8/09 to Shakie Stoneunread, Dec 8, 2009, 12:07:12 PM12/8/09 to fans Microsoft Windows XP C:\>ping 8.8.8.8 Pinging 8.8.8.8 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.8.8: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=240 Ping statistics for 8.8.8.8: Minimum = 67ms, Maximum = 70ms, Average = 68ms C:\>ping 8.8.4.4 Pinging 8.8.4.4 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 8.8.4.4: bytes=32 time=66ms
TTL=240 Ping statistics for
8.8.4.4: Minimum = 64ms, Maximum = 66ms, Average = 65ms zhudogsupe.wangleiunread, Dec 7, 2009, 7:26:11 AM12/7/09 to |